﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>SoftwareTestPro.com Process Feed</title><description /><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/4890/Software-Quality-Optimization---White-Paper/Test-and-QA-Performance-Quality-Assurance-Process-Software</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/4890/Software-Quality-Optimization---White-Paper/Test-and-QA-Performance-Quality-Assurance-Process-Software</link><author>rbaucom@redwoodcollaborative.com</author><category>Test and QA</category><category>Performance</category><category>Quality Assurance</category><category>Process</category><category>Software</category><title>Software Quality Optimization - White Paper</title><description>Balancing business transformation and risk.</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:00:00 -0700</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5766/The-Benefits-of-a-Bad-Work-Environment/Software-Testing-Process-Agile</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5766/The-Benefits-of-a-Bad-Work-Environment/Software-Testing-Process-Agile</link><author>matt.heusser@gmail.com</author><category>Software</category><category>Testing</category><category>Process</category><category>Agile</category><title>The Benefits of a Bad Work Environment</title><description>So you're 'stuck' at a bad workplace?  Here's how to make the most of it!</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 05:13:18 -0700</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5756/Situational-Awareness/Software-Test-and-QA-Teams-Strategy-Process-Project-Management-Quality-Assurance-Requirements</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5756/Situational-Awareness/Software-Test-and-QA-Teams-Strategy-Process-Project-Management-Quality-Assurance-Requirements</link><author>matt.heusser@gmail.com</author><category>Software</category><category>Test and QA</category><category>Teams</category><category>Strategy</category><category>Process</category><category>Project Management</category><category>Quality Assurance</category><category>Requirements</category><title>Situational Awareness</title><description>Have you ever been in a place and realized, in a moment, that something was amiss?</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:36:34 -0700</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5740/Stop-the-Life-Cycle-I-want-to-get-off/Agile-Software-Testing-Process</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5740/Stop-the-Life-Cycle-I-want-to-get-off/Agile-Software-Testing-Process</link><author>matt.heusser@gmail.com</author><category>Agile</category><category>Software</category><category>Testing</category><category>Process</category><title>Stop the Life Cycle, I want to get off</title><description>Where Matt talks about the Software Development lifecycle ... or lack thereof.</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:39:53 -0700</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5734/Lean-Coffee/Software-Agile-Conference-Presentations-How-To-Process</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5734/Lean-Coffee/Software-Agile-Conference-Presentations-How-To-Process</link><author>matt.heusser@gmail.com</author><category>Software</category><category>Agile</category><category>Conference Presentations</category><category>How To</category><category>Process</category><title>Lean Coffee</title><description>Where Matt talks about a Generic, Open Space meeting format.</description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 02:26:56 -0700</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5584/The-Job-of-Testing/Testing-Process</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5584/The-Job-of-Testing/Testing-Process</link><author>dlamppert@templeton.com</author><category>Testing</category><category>Process</category><title>The Job of Testing</title><description>How would you respond to the following question?
“What is the job of testing?”
</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:00:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5594/Improving-the-Test-Process/Process-Testing</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5594/Improving-the-Test-Process/Process-Testing</link><author>rex_black@rbcs-us.com</author><category>Process</category><category>Testing</category><title>Improving the Test Process</title><description>Previously recorded on 5/22/2012</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:00:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5386/Maybe-it-is-like-building-houses/Software-Test-and-QA-Development-Editorial-Process-Strategy-Teams-Testing</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5386/Maybe-it-is-like-building-houses/Software-Test-and-QA-Development-Editorial-Process-Strategy-Teams-Testing</link><author>matt.heusser@gmail.com</author><category>Software</category><category>Test and QA</category><category>Development</category><category>Editorial</category><category>Process</category><category>Strategy</category><category>Teams</category><category>Testing</category><title>Maybe it is like building houses</title><description>Where Matt points out that the folks claiming that software dev is like building houses not only don't understand software development ... they probably don't understand building houses, either.</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:42:57 -0700</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5352/New-Ways-of-Thinking-in-Software-Testing/Agile-Software-Test-and-QA-Technology-Strategy-Process-Editorial</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5352/New-Ways-of-Thinking-in-Software-Testing/Agile-Software-Test-and-QA-Technology-Strategy-Process-Editorial</link><author>matt.heusser@gmail.com</author><category>Agile</category><category>Software</category><category>Test and QA</category><category>Technology</category><category>Strategy</category><category>Process</category><category>Editorial</category><title>New Ways of Thinking in Software Testing</title><description>Five years ago, Cem Kaner held up his cell phone.</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:56:48 -0700</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5344/Steps-To-Achieving-Governance-in-Development-Testing/Testing-Process-Strategy</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5344/Steps-To-Achieving-Governance-in-Development-Testing/Testing-Process-Strategy</link><author>angel.lopez@lewispulse.com</author><category>Testing</category><category>Process</category><category>Strategy</category><title>Steps To Achieving Governance in Development Testing</title><description>You can't govern what you can't see. As simple as this axiom might sound, it holds true for industries of all types. It holds particular relevance to the IT industry since many critical processes that an entire business depends on runs under the hood in complicated code scripts and millions of lines of code. It is imperative for businesses to be able to pop the hood open and make sure that they have as much visibility into the inner workings of their business less something that could be preventable brings down an entire system. Bugs and code defects can definitely do that. With increasing code complexity, it is no longer a surprise to hear news stories of how entire clouds went offline, bringing down hundreds of dependent businesses along with them. </description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:00:00 -0700</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5346/You-Get-Three-Hours/Software-Process</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5346/You-Get-Three-Hours/Software-Process</link><author>matt.heusser@gmail.com</author><category>Software</category><category>Process</category><title>You Get Three Hours</title><description>Where Matt talks about a common problem in large organizations ... and provides some hint to improve the workplace</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:55:08 -0700</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5329/The-Shift-From-Stereotypical-to-Effective-Tester/Process-Best-Practices</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5329/The-Shift-From-Stereotypical-to-Effective-Tester/Process-Best-Practices</link><author>mkhammammettu@calcas.com</author><category>Process</category><category>Best Practices</category><title>The Shift, From Stereotypical to Effective Tester</title><description>A stereotypical description of an application tester’s role is usually about being given specifications, reporting bugs, verifying and closing bugs. This stereotypical tester will have a part to play in a testing organization, but will always be considered an outsider to the project and will not have much impact on the project lifecycle.</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 08:00:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5312/Enterprise-Process-Assurance-The-Missing-Link/Process</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5312/Enterprise-Process-Assurance-The-Missing-Link/Process</link><author>Lhayes@worksoft.com</author><category>Process</category><title>Enterprise Process Assurance: The Missing Link</title><description>The implementation of packaged enterprise software changes the dynamics of the relationship between the business and IT, creating new opportunities, risks and challenges. The business gains the control and flexibility to tune business processes more quickly and easily, as well as the power to integrate those processes end to end across the enterprise.  But these advantages also shift responsibility for validation from IT to the business, introducing new risks and organizational challenges.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:00:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5260/Building-Highly-Effective-OnOffshore-QA-Teams/offshore-Test-and-QA-Process-Teams</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5260/Building-Highly-Effective-OnOffshore-QA-Teams/offshore-Test-and-QA-Process-Teams</link><a10:author><a10:name>Cory Medlin</a10:name><a10:email>corymedlin@gmail.com</a10:email></a10:author><a10:author><a10:name>Sripriya Kalyanasundaram, AVP</a10:name><a10:email>tpassword@redwoodco.com</a10:email></a10:author><category>offshore</category><category>Test and QA</category><category>Process</category><category>Teams</category><title>Building Highly Effective On/Offshore QA Teams</title><description>The offshore testing
model does not have to be painful or
difficult, or strain the QA organization.</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:00:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5263/Advanced-Software-Testing-Code-Coverage/Management-Testing-Process</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5263/Advanced-Software-Testing-Code-Coverage/Management-Testing-Process</link><author>rex_black@rbcs-us.com</author><category>Management</category><category>Testing</category><category>Process</category><title>Advanced Software Testing: Code Coverage</title><description>Previously recorded on August 9, 2011.</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:00:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5210/The-Psychopolitics-of-Test-Management/Web-Management-Testing-Process</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5210/The-Psychopolitics-of-Test-Management/Web-Management-Testing-Process</link><author>rex_black@rbcs-us.com</author><category>Web</category><category>Management</category><category>Testing</category><category>Process</category><title>The Psychopolitics of Test Management</title><description>Previously recorded on July 7, 2011</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:00:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5204/Eclipse-for-Testers/Technology-Software-Agile-Performance-Services-Development-Functional-Integration-Open-Source-Process-Testing-Unit-Mobile-Web-Tools</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5204/Eclipse-for-Testers/Technology-Software-Agile-Performance-Services-Development-Functional-Integration-Open-Source-Process-Testing-Unit-Mobile-Web-Tools</link><author>werner.keil@gmx.net</author><category>Technology</category><category>Software</category><category>Agile</category><category>Performance</category><category>Services</category><category>Development</category><category>Functional</category><category>Integration</category><category>Open Source</category><category>Process</category><category>Testing</category><category>Unit</category><category>Mobile</category><category>Web</category><category>Tools</category><title>Eclipse for Testers</title><description>Eclipse has been one of the best IDEs for unit testing ever since its early days. Not too great a surprise, as until a few months ago, JUnit co-founder Erich Gamma was also lead engineer for Eclipse Java Development Tools and related IBM products like Rational Jazz. From Version 3.2 on, JUnit was directly built into Eclipse after a separate plug-in has already been available.</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:00:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5198/The-Tyranny-of-%27Things%27---Part-III-(Breaking-Through)/Performance-Process-Quality-Assurance-Research</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5198/The-Tyranny-of-%27Things%27---Part-III-(Breaking-Through)/Performance-Process-Quality-Assurance-Research</link><author>matt.heusser@gmail.com</author><category>Performance</category><category>Process</category><category>Quality Assurance</category><category>Research</category><title>The Tyranny of 'Things' - Part III (Breaking Through)</title><description>Where Matt takes about the breakthrough, and how becoming really, really efficient might just be holding you back from it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 20:25:37 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5191/The-Tyranny-of-%27Things%27---Part-II/Software-Process-podcast</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5191/The-Tyranny-of-%27Things%27---Part-II/Software-Process-podcast</link><author>matt.heusser@gmail.com</author><category>Software</category><category>Process</category><category>podcast</category><title>The Tyranny of 'Things' - Part II</title><description>Where Matt describes a couple of personal productivity systems</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:37:52 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5185/Jasmine-BDD-for-JavaScript/Test-and-QA-How-To-Agile-Automation-Services-Development-Integration-Open-Source-Process-Testing-Unit-User-Mobile-Web</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5185/Jasmine-BDD-for-JavaScript/Test-and-QA-How-To-Agile-Automation-Services-Development-Integration-Open-Source-Process-Testing-Unit-User-Mobile-Web</link><author>werner.keil@gmx.net</author><category>Test and QA</category><category>How To</category><category>Agile</category><category>Automation</category><category>Services</category><category>Development</category><category>Integration</category><category>Open Source</category><category>Process</category><category>Testing</category><category>Unit</category><category>User</category><category>Mobile</category><category>Web</category><title>Jasmine, BDD for JavaScript</title><description>A few months ago, a meeting of Vienna JavaScript User Group (Vienna.js) introduced me to Jasmine, a Behavior Driven Development Testing Framework for JavaScript.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:00:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5186/The-Tyranny-of-%27Things%27---Part-I/Software-How-To-Strategy-Process</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5186/The-Tyranny-of-%27Things%27---Part-I/Software-How-To-Strategy-Process</link><author>matt.heusser@gmail.com</author><category>Software</category><category>How To</category><category>Strategy</category><category>Process</category><title>The Tyranny of 'Things' - Part I</title><description>Where Matt Talks about Personal Productivity Systems</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:06:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5183/Lessons-Learned-in-Data-Migration/Best-Practices-Process-Project-Management-End-to-End</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5183/Lessons-Learned-in-Data-Migration/Best-Practices-Process-Project-Management-End-to-End</link><author>milansengupta@yahoo.com</author><category>Best Practices</category><category>Process</category><category>Project Management</category><category>End to End</category><title>Lessons Learned in Data Migration</title><description>When I began working on a data migration project last year, I did not have much idea as to what it could entail. I did not have much experience with data migration apart from having some theoretical knowledge of what one should consider for testing such a project scope.</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:00:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5182/Performance-Requirements-An-Attempt-at-a-Systematic-View/Performance-Requirements-Process-Software-User</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5182/Performance-Requirements-An-Attempt-at-a-Systematic-View/Performance-Requirements-Process-Software-User</link><author>alex.podelko@oracle.com</author><category>Performance</category><category>Requirements</category><category>Process</category><category>Software</category><category>User</category><title>Performance Requirements: An Attempt at a Systematic View</title><description>“Response times
(in the case of
interactive work)
or processing times
(in the case of batch
jobs or scheduled
activities) define how
fast requests should
be processed.”</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5181/Exploratory-Testing-As-a-Creative-Process/Exploratory-STQA-Magazine-Testing-Management-Process</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5181/Exploratory-Testing-As-a-Creative-Process/Exploratory-STQA-Magazine-Testing-Management-Process</link><author>testfirst@gmail.com</author><category>Exploratory</category><category>ST&amp;QA Magazine</category><category>Testing</category><category>Management</category><category>Process</category><title>Exploratory Testing As a Creative Process</title><description>In testing, we investigate technical, functional,
usability and aesthetic concerns simultaneously
and independently, mixing and mashing them as we go until
we believe we’ve captured the essence of the test target, that is,
the feature we are investigating.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5158/Testing-Metrics-Project-Process-and-Product/Metrics-Testing-Process</guid><link>http://www.softwaretestpro.com/Item/5158/Testing-Metrics-Project-Process-and-Product/Metrics-Testing-Process</link><author>rex_black@rbcs-us.com</author><category>Metrics</category><category>Testing</category><category>Process</category><title>Testing Metrics: Project, Process and Product</title><description>Previously recorded on May 26, 2011 </description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:00:00 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>